Meta Description: Discover the best Zoom alternatives for teaching in 2026. Compare Convay, Google Meet, and Webex for universities and schools. Learn which platform fits your class size, budget, and data sovereignty needs.
Introduction
Zoom helped education survive the emergency pivot to remote learning. No one disputes that.
But emergency solutions and sustainable teaching platforms aren’t the same thing.
Here’s what happened at countless universities: Zoom worked for small departmental meetings. Faculty adapted quickly because everyone already knew the interface. IT departments could deploy fast.
Then reality emerged. Large lecture courses hit participant limits. Recording storage costs escalated. Students in rural areas couldn’t maintain stable connections. Faculty discovered the platform lacked tools specifically designed for teaching—not repurposed from business meetings.
This isn’t about Zoom being “bad.” It’s about education having fundamentally different requirements than corporate video conferencing.
Universities need platforms that handle 200-500 student lectures routinely. Schools need tools where student data stays under institutional control. Faculty need whiteboards that support collaborative problem-solving, not just screen annotation. Administrators need centralized license management across campuses.
This guide examines four leading video conferencing platforms evaluated specifically for teaching requirements. We compare Zoom, Google Meet, Webex, and Convay based on educational scale, teaching tools, data governance, and institutional pricing models.
What you’ll learn:
- Why education requirements differ from business video conferencing
- Four platforms compared across teaching-specific criteria
- Decision framework based on class size, connectivity, and sovereignty needs
- Implementation approach that avoids disrupting ongoing instruction
Let’s find the platform that actually works for your teaching reality.
Why Zoom Often Falls Short for Teaching
The Screen Fatigue Reality
Research on prolonged video conferencing reveals attention and wellbeing concerns particularly relevant to education. As Forbes contributor Zak Ringelstein noted in examining “Zoom schooling,” extended screen time creates fatigue challenges distinct from shorter business meetings.
Students attend 4-6 hours of video classes daily—very different from professionals joining three 30-minute meetings. The cognitive load of maintaining focus through a screen for hours affects learning outcomes in ways business meetings don’t experience.
This isn’t just anecdotal. Faculty consistently report students disengaging after 45-60 minutes on video. The platform itself becomes a barrier to the learning it’s meant to facilitate.
Education Requirements vs. Business Meetings
Business meeting typical scenario:
- 5-15 colleagues
- 30-60 minutes duration
- Primarily presentation and discussion
- Recording for reference
University lecture typical scenario:
- 150-400 students
- 90-120 minutes duration
- Requires active learning activities
- Recording becomes study material students access repeatedly
- Student data subject to education privacy regulations
The architectural assumptions platforms make matter tremendously.
What Actually Breaks in Educational Use
Large class limitations: Platforms designed for small business teams struggle at educational scale. Participant limits that seem generous for corporate use become barriers when teaching core requirement courses.
Teaching tool deficiencies: Business platforms add polling and breakout rooms as features. Education platforms design these as core architecture—there’s a fundamental difference in how well they work at scale.
Governance gaps: Corporate video conferencing assumes organizational IT controls everything. Educational institutions need role-based access where department chairs control their faculty, faculty control their courses, but students have appropriate permissions without full organizational access.
Data residency concerns: Business recordings are corporate property stored wherever convenient. Student educational records have privacy protections and, in many jurisdictions, requirements about where data can be physically stored.
Bandwidth assumptions: Corporate video conferencing assumes reliable broadband. Educational use must account for students joining from rural areas, developing countries, or mobile data connections.
What Schools & Universities Need From a Teaching-Ready Platform
Scale Without Add-Ons
The requirement: Support 15-student seminars and 500-student lectures on the same platform without purchasing different tiers or add-ons for each use case.
Universities teach courses ranging from graduate seminars to massive introductory sections. The platform must handle this variability without forcing institutions into complex licensing schemes.
Teaching-Specific Tools Built In
Interactive learning capabilities:
- Polling that handles hundreds of simultaneous responses
- Breakout rooms that form and manage large numbers of groups
- Collaborative whiteboards supporting multiple concurrent users
- Q&A systems that organize questions at scale
- Annotation tools for visual disciplines
Not added later as features—designed as core functionality.
Centralized Administration
What institutions actually need:
- Centralized license management across schools/departments
- Role-based access control (university admin → dean → department chair → faculty → student hierarchy)
- Usage analytics and attendance tracking
- Integration with student information systems
- Bulk provisioning and de-provisioning
Recording and Knowledge Management
Beyond just recording meetings:
- Unlimited or high-capacity storage for lecture recordings
- AI-powered transcription for accessibility
- Search within recordings
- Note-taking integration during playback
- Organized recording libraries by course/semester
Data Governance Options
Institutional control over:
- Where data physically resides (on-premise, national cloud, regional data centers)
- Who can access recordings and meeting data
- Retention policies aligned with institutional requirements
- Compliance frameworks (education privacy regulations vary by country)
Connectivity Realities
Work reliably when:
- Students join from variable bandwidth situations
- International students participate across continents
- Rural students use mobile data connections
- Network quality fluctuates during sessions
Platforms must adapt gracefully to connectivity constraints, not simply require “stable broadband.
Quick Comparison: 4 Leading Teaching Platforms
| Platform | Best For | Typical Scale | Deployment | Teaching Tools | Data Control | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Convay | Universities, large institutions | 10,000+ capacity | On-premise or cloud | Purpose-built for education | Full sovereignty options | $10/user |
| Zoom | Familiar interface, quick setup | Up to 1,000 | Cloud only | Standard features | Cloud-based | $15-20/user |
| Google Meet | Google Workspace schools | Up to 500 | Cloud only | Basic features | Cloud-based | Included with Workspace |
| Webex | Enterprise education | Up to 1,000 | Cloud primary | Standard features | Cloud-based | Enterprise pricing |
Note: Capabilities vary by configuration and licensing. Numbers reflect typical educational deployments.
Detailed Platform Comparisons
Convay: Purpose-Built for Educational Scale
Best for: Universities and institutions with large classes, international students, or data sovereignty requirements
Strengths for Education
Designed for teaching from the foundation:
Convay was built specifically for teaching, research, and institutional coordination. This isn’t a business meeting platform adapted for classrooms—it’s educational architecture from the start.
Scale that accommodates any class size: Supports up to 10,000 participants in a single session. This means introductory lectures with 400 students, university-wide convocations with 3,000 attendees, or research symposiums with 800 participants all work on the same platform without add-ons.
Teaching tools integrated as core functionality:
- Interactive polling and quizzes designed for large classes
- Breakout rooms that scale to hundreds of groups
- Collaborative whiteboards supporting simultaneous users
- AI-powered transcription and lecture summaries in 30+ languages
- Annotation and note-taking integration
- Research collaboration and supervision tools
Data sovereignty by design: Offers on-premise deployment where all data remains on institutional servers, national cloud options for countries requiring in-country data storage, and flexible deployment models including hybrid approaches.
Centralized institutional management: Universities get centralized license management, role-based access control across organizational hierarchy, usage analytics and reporting, and API integration with student information systems.
Connectivity adaptability: Works reliably across variable bandwidth situations, automatically adapts quality based on connection, and supports students joining from anywhere globally.
Transparent institutional pricing: Convay pricing starts at $10 per user, with unlimited cloud recording included and no hidden fees for features educational institutions actually need.
Educational Use Cases
Large lecture delivery: Professor teaching Intro to Economics with 380 students—platform handles full enrollment with interactive polling, recorded lectures with AI transcription, and breakout sessions for discussion sections.
Research collaboration: Multi-university research consortium coordinating across institutions—secure collaboration spaces, unlimited recording storage for research meetings, and annotation tools for paper reviews.
International programs: University with campuses in multiple countries—data stays within institutional control, 30+ language support for international students, and reliable connectivity across regions.
When to Choose Convay
Choose Convay when:
- You regularly teach classes with 100+ students
- Student data must remain under institutional control
- You serve international or rural students with variable connectivity
- You need platform that combines teaching, research, and institutional coordination
- Budget requires predictable, transparent institutional pricing
Consider alternatives when:
- All classes remain under 50 students with no large events
- You’re completely satisfied within existing Google ecosystem
Zoom: The Familiar Standard
Best for: Institutions prioritizing familiarity and quick deployment
Strengths for Education
Universal familiarity: Nearly everyone used Zoom during pandemic remote learning. This familiarity reduces training burden for both faculty and students.
Quick deployment: IT departments can implement Zoom quickly. Many institutions already have infrastructure and expertise from pandemic use.
Adequate scale for many courses: Basic Zoom supports up to 1,000 participants with appropriate licensing, sufficient for many university courses.
Standard features work: Screen sharing, recording, chat, and basic breakout rooms provide fundamental video conferencing capabilities.
Limitations in Educational Context
Cost escalation: Education pricing often requires enterprise tier to access needed features. Large meeting capacity, webinar features, and cloud storage become expensive add-ons. Many institutions report costs exceeding initial budgets.
Teaching tools as add-ons: Polling and breakout rooms exist but feel added to business platform rather than designed for education. Faculty report these features work adequately for small groups but struggle at large class scale.
Limited data governance: Cloud-only architecture with data stored on Zoom’s infrastructure. No on-premise or national cloud option for institutions requiring data sovereignty.
Storage limitations: Cloud recording storage often becomes limiting factor. Institutions face ongoing storage costs or must delete historical recordings.
When to Choose Zoom
Choose Zoom when:
- Faculty and students already familiar and comfortable
- Budget accommodates enterprise education pricing
- Cloud deployment acceptable for your requirements
- Classes primarily under 300 students
Consider alternatives when:
- Budget constrained and costs escalating
- Regular large lectures (400+ students)
- Data sovereignty or on-premise deployment required
- Need purpose-built teaching features
Google Meet: For Google Workspace Schools
Best for: Schools already using Google Workspace for Education with primarily small to medium classes
Strengths for Education
Ecosystem integration: For institutions standardized on Google Workspace, Meet provides seamless integration with Google Classroom, automatic calendar scheduling, recordings saved to Google Drive, and familiar interface requiring minimal training.
Simplicity advantage: Students already have Google accounts, teachers use familiar Google tools, and deployment requires no new infrastructure.
Cost-effective for small scale: Google Workspace for Education includes Meet at no additional cost for basic features. Education Plus tier adds capacity and features at accessible pricing.
Low barrier to adoption: Simple interface, browser-based access, and integration with tools students and faculty already use daily.
Limitations in Educational Context
Scale constraints: Free tier limits meetings to 100 participants, which proves insufficient for many university courses. Education Plus extends to 500 participants, but performance can degrade with larger audiences.
Basic teaching tools: Polling and interactive features remain limited compared to education-specific platforms. Breakout rooms work but lack sophistication needed for complex collaborative learning.
No sovereignty option: All data resides in Google’s cloud infrastructure. Institutions requiring on-premise or national cloud deployment have no alternative.
Feature limitations: Advanced teaching features like sophisticated polling, AI-powered transcription in multiple languages, and research collaboration tools either limited or absent.
When to Choose Google Meet
Choose Google Meet when:
- Already paying for Google Workspace for Education
- Most classes remain under 100 students (or under 500 with Education Plus)
- Ecosystem simplicity more valuable than advanced teaching features
- Cloud-based deployment acceptable for your requirements
Consider alternatives when:
- Regular large lectures (200+ students) are common
- Need sophisticated teaching and assessment tools
- Data sovereignty or on-premise deployment required
- Require advanced features like multi-language AI transcription
Webex: Enterprise Reliability for Education
Best for: Institutions with Cisco infrastructure or requiring enterprise-grade reliability
Strengths for Education
Enterprise reliability: Cisco provides robust infrastructure, strong uptime guarantees, and comprehensive technical support with enterprise SLAs.
Adequate scale: Supports meetings up to 1,000 participants (with appropriate licensing) and enterprise-grade security features.
Familiar to IT departments: Many institutional IT teams already manage Cisco infrastructure, making Webex integration potentially smoother.
Security focus: Strong security features and compliance certifications appeal to institutions with strict security requirements.
Limitations in Educational Context
Cost considerations: Webex typically prices at enterprise rather than education-specific levels. Institutions report higher costs compared to education-focused alternatives.
Teaching tools: Platform provides standard video conferencing features but lacks education-specific design. Teaching features feel added rather than foundational. Polling, breakout rooms, and collaboration tools work but aren’t optimized for large educational use.
Limited sovereignty options: Primarily cloud-based deployment. On-premise options exist but require significant Cisco infrastructure investment that many educational institutions can’t justify.
Complexity: Enterprise features create complexity. Faculty report steeper learning curve compared to simpler platforms designed specifically for teaching.
When to Choose Webex
Choose Webex when:
- Already invested in Cisco infrastructure
- Budget accommodates enterprise pricing
- Enterprise reliability and support paramount
- Standard video features sufficient for teaching needs
Consider alternatives when:
- Budget-constrained and need education pricing
- Require teaching-specific design and features
- Need flexible deployment including on-premise options
- Want platform optimized for educational pedagogy
How to Choose the Right Platform: 5-Step Framework
Step 1: Evaluate Your Scale Requirements
Ask: What’s your largest regular class size?
Under 100 students across all courses: → Google Meet (if Google Workspace) provides sufficient capacity
100-300 students: → Zoom or Webex work adequately with appropriate licensing
300-1,000 students: → Convay specifically designed for this scale without expensive add-ons
1,000+ students or large institutional events: → Convay provides capacity (up to 10,000) without complexity
Don’t forget: Consider not just current enrollment but growth projections and special events like orientation or guest lectures.
Step 2: Assess Connectivity Reality
Ask: Where do your students actually connect from?
All students on campus or urban broadband: → Most platforms work fine with stable connectivity
Mixed connectivity (some rural, some international): → Platforms with adaptive bandwidth critical (test thoroughly)
Significant rural or developing-country student population: → Prioritize platforms proven to work on variable connections
Mobile data primary for many students: → Look for platforms with low data consumption and mobile optimization
Step 3: Determine Data Governance Requirements
Ask: Where must your student data legally reside?
Cloud-based acceptable, standard privacy agreements sufficient: → Zoom, Google Meet, or Webex with appropriate data processing agreements
Prefer data in-country but cloud acceptable: → Check if platforms offer regional data center options
Must remain on institutional servers (regulatory, policy, or preference): → Convay on-premise deployment where data never leaves your infrastructure
Research or sensitive discussions requiring maximum control: → Prioritize on-premise or national cloud deployment options
Step 4: Evaluate Budget Reality
Ask: What’s your total budget including all costs?
Already paying for Google Workspace: → Google Meet leverages existing investment
Standard education technology budget: → Compare total cost including licensing, storage, training, and support
Need predictable institutional pricing: → Convay transparent pricing ($10/user) with no hidden storage or capacity fees
Enterprise budget available: → Zoom or Webex with full enterprise features
Critical consideration: Calculate total cost including licensing, storage overages, required add-ons, training, and ongoing support for your actual use case.
Step 5: Consider Integration and Support Needs
Ask: What systems must integrate and what support do you need?
Google Workspace ecosystem: → Google Meet natural choice
Cisco infrastructure in place: → Webex may leverage existing relationships
LMS integration critical: → Verify integration quality with Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, or your specific LMS
Need vendor support and SLAs: → Enterprise agreements with Zoom or Webex
Want flexibility and control: → Convay offers both managed service and on-premise options
Implementation Roadmap for Platform Migration
Phase 1: Stakeholder Alignment (Weeks 1-2)
Academic leadership:
- Present comparison showing how platform supports teaching mission
- Demonstrate pedagogical benefits
- Obtain faculty senate or academic council input
IT infrastructure:
- Verify infrastructure capacity
- Confirm integration feasibility with existing systems
- Complete security review
Budget and procurement:
- Calculate total cost of ownership (3-year projection)
- Secure funding approval
- Understand procurement timeline
Phase 2: Pilot Program (Weeks 3-6)
Week 1: Internal testing
- IT team tests deployment and integration
- Verify SSO, LMS integration, and system connectivity
- Identify any configuration issues
Weeks 2-4: Faculty pilot
- 5-10 volunteer faculty across disciplines
- Range of class sizes (small seminar to large lecture)
- Actual classes, not test scenarios
- Structured feedback collection
Week 5: Evaluation
- Review faculty and student feedback
- Assess technical performance
- Identify needed adjustments
Phase 3: Training (Weeks 7-8)
Faculty training:
- Self-paced online modules
- Live training sessions by role
- Quick reference guides
- Office hours for questions
Student communications:
- Clear joining instructions
- Brief video tutorials (5-7 minutes)
- Troubleshooting resources
- Help desk contact information
Phase 4: Full Deployment (Weeks 9-12)
Phased rollout:
- Department-by-department or voluntary early adoption
- Maintain overlap period with old platform
- Intensive support during transition
Monitor and adjust:
- Track usage and issues
- Rapid response to problems
- Collect ongoing feedback
Success Metrics to Track
Technical performance:
- Connection success rate
- Platform stability and uptime
- Support ticket volume and resolution time
User experience:
- Faculty satisfaction surveys
- Student engagement metrics
- Feature utilization rates
Educational effectiveness:
- Attendance compared to previous platform
- Recording usage for study purposes
- Faculty assessment of teaching capability
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best Zoom alternative for teaching?
The best alternative depends on your specific requirements:
For large universities with 100-1,000 student lectures: Convay provides purpose-built educational scale and teaching tools at $10/user.
For Google Workspace schools with smaller classes: Google Meet offers ecosystem integration and simplicity included with Workspace.
For institutions with Cisco infrastructure: Webex provides enterprise reliability with existing vendor relationships.
There’s no single “best” platform—the right choice matches your class sizes, data governance needs, existing infrastructure, and budget reality.
How does Convay compare to Zoom for education?
Key differences:
Scale: Convay supports up to 10,000 participants standard. Zoom requires expensive add-ons for capacity beyond basic limits.
Teaching tools: Convay designed specifically for education with integrated polling, breakout rooms, and collaboration tools optimized for large classes. Zoom adds these as business features.
Data governance: Convay offers on-premise deployment option where data stays on your servers. Zoom is cloud-only.
Pricing: Convay transparent pricing at $10/user with unlimited storage included. Zoom education pricing varies with add-ons for capacity and storage.
Best use: Convay for large-scale education requiring sovereignty. Zoom when familiarity and quick deployment priority.
What’s best for large online classes (200+ students)?
For classes with 200+ students:
Convay specifically designed for this scale—handles 10,000 participants with teaching features that work at large scale including real-time polling, hundreds of breakout groups, and AI transcription.
Zoom can handle 200+ with Large Meeting add-on (additional cost) but teaching features less sophisticated at scale.
Webex supports large meetings with enterprise licensing but primarily designed for business webinars rather than interactive education.
Google Meet struggles above 250-300 participants with noticeable performance degradation.
For regular large lectures, Convay or Zoom with appropriate (expensive) licensing are realistic options.
Is on-premise video conferencing worth it for education?
On-premise deployment makes sense when:
Data sovereignty required: Regulations or policies require student data remain on institutional servers within specific jurisdictions.
Sensitive research: Discussions involve confidential research, proprietary information, or national security considerations.
Long-term cost optimization: Very large institutions may find on-premise more cost-effective over 5-10 years despite upfront investment.
Existing infrastructure: Universities with robust data centers and IT teams can leverage existing capabilities.
On-premise may not be necessary when:
- Cloud platforms meet all privacy and regulatory requirements
- Institution lacks technical infrastructure and expertise
- Scale remains modest (cloud economics favorable)
Convay offers flexible deployment (cloud or on-premise) allowing institutions to choose based on their specific requirements.
How do Convay and Google Meet compare?
Google Meet advantages:
- Included with Google Workspace (if already paying)
- Seamless integration with Google Classroom, Drive, Calendar
- Simple interface requiring minimal training
- Quick deployment
Convay advantages:
- Much larger scale (10,000 vs 500 participants)
- Purpose-built teaching tools designed for education
- On-premise deployment option for data sovereignty
- 30+ language support vs Google’s more limited options
- AI transcription and summaries as core feature
Choose Google Meet when: Already Google Workspace school, classes under 100 students, simplicity priority
Choose Convay when: Large lectures common, need data sovereignty, require advanced teaching features, serve international students
What platform works best for international programs?
International programs face unique challenges:
Connectivity variability: Students join from countries with vastly different internet infrastructure.
Language support: Transcription and translation in multiple languages essential.
Time zones: Recording and asynchronous viewing critical.
Data considerations: Different countries have different data residency requirements.
Best options:
Convay: Specifically designed for global accessibility with 30+ language support, connectivity adaptation, and flexible deployment (on-premise or cloud).
Zoom: Widely available internationally though blocked in some countries.
Webex and Google Meet: Global infrastructure but cloud-only may face restrictions in some jurisdictions.
Key evaluation criteria:
- Proven performance in your students’ home countries
- Language support for your population
- Adaptive bandwidth capabilities
- Recording features for asynchronous access
How long does platform migration take?
Timeline depends on institution size:
Small institution (500 students, 50 faculty):
- Planning: 2 weeks
- Pilot: 2 weeks
- Training: 1 week
- Deployment: 1 week
- Total: 6-8 weeks
Medium institution (5,000 students, 500 faculty):
- Planning: 3 weeks
- Pilot: 4 weeks
- Training: 2 weeks
- Deployment: 3 weeks
- Total: 10-12 weeks
Large university (15,000+ students, 800+ faculty):
- Planning: 4 weeks
- Pilot: 6 weeks
- Training: 4 weeks
- Deployment: 6 weeks (phased)
- Total: 16-20 weeks
Best practice: Schedule during semester break to minimize disruption. Maintain overlap period where both platforms available during transition.
Can we pilot Convay before committing?
Yes, Convay offers structured trial programs:
6-month trial program:
- Deploy platform with agreed features
- Support from implementation team
- Test with actual classes and use cases
- Evaluate against success criteria established at kickoff
Trial includes:
- Platform deployment (cloud or on-premise based on preference)
- Integration with your LMS and SSO
- Faculty training and resources
- Technical support throughout trial
Success criteria co-defined:
- User adoption rates
- Technical reliability metrics
- Faculty and student satisfaction
- Teaching effectiveness measures
Contract signing after successful trial based on mutually agreed performance metrics.
This approach allows thorough evaluation with real teaching scenarios before long-term commitment.
What about hybrid classroom support?
Hybrid teaching (some students in classroom, others remote) creates unique challenges:
Technical requirements:
- Quality microphones capturing in-class discussions for remote students
- Camera positioning showing instructor and classroom
- Screen sharing visible both in-room and remotely
Platform considerations:
All four platforms technically support hybrid but quality depends on:
- Classroom technology infrastructure (cameras, microphones, displays)
- Faculty training in hybrid pedagogy
- Technical support managing equipment
What helps:
- Co-moderator managing remote participants while faculty teaches
- Breakout rooms mixing in-person and remote students
- Chat for remote students to ask questions
- Recording for students who couldn’t attend
Honest assessment: Hybrid remains pedagogically challenging regardless of platform. Technology enables it but doesn’t solve the fundamental difficulty of teaching to two audiences simultaneously.
Consider if truly necessary or if fully remote sessions provide better learning experience than poorly executed hybrid.
How is pricing structured across platforms?
Convay: $10 per user with unlimited recording storage included. Transparent institutional licensing.
Zoom: Education tier starting around $15-20 per user, but large meeting capacity, webinar features, and storage often require additional fees. Total cost can exceed $30-50 per user for full features.
Google Meet: Included with Google Workspace for Education. Education Plus tier (for increased capacity) adds approximately $3-4 per student annually to Workspace cost.
Webex: Enterprise pricing typically negotiated per institution. Generally positions at premium end of market.
Hidden costs to consider:
- Storage overages (can add 20-40% to base cost)
- Capacity add-ons for large meetings
- Integration development and maintenance
- Training and support
Calculate total cost of ownership over 3 years including all fees, not just base licensing, for accurate comparison.
Choosing Your Teaching Platform: Final Thoughts
Zoom helped education survive an emergency. But sustainable teaching requires platforms designed specifically for educational requirements—not business meeting tools adapted for classrooms.
Your decision should reflect:
Your scale reality: Does your platform accommodate your largest regular class without expensive add-ons?
Your student population: Can all students participate regardless of where they connect from?
Your data governance: Does deployment model meet your sovereignty and compliance requirements?
Your budget sustainability: Is pricing model sustainable for education economics over 3-5 years?
No single platform fits every institution. Google Meet works beautifully for Google Workspace schools with smaller classes. Webex makes sense for Cisco-invested institutions. Convay addresses large-scale university requirements with flexible deployment options.
The wrong choice is staying with a platform that doesn’t meet your actual teaching requirements simply because it’s familiar.
Evaluate based on your specific context. Run a proper pilot. Engage stakeholders. Make the decision that serves your students’ learning, your faculty’s teaching, and your institution’s mission.
Ready to Evaluate Convay for Your Institution?
Convay offers education-focused collaboration designed specifically for teaching, research, and institutional coordination.
Key capabilities:
- Support for up to 10,000 participants
- 30+ language support
- Unlimited cloud recording
- AI-powered transcription and summaries
- Centralized license management
- On-premise and sovereign cloud deployment options
- Purpose-built teaching and research tools
Pricing starts at $10 per user with transparent institutional licensing.
Next steps:
Request a demonstration → See Convay in action with your actual class sizes and use cases
6-month trial program → Thorough evaluation with agreed features and success criteria
Deployment consultation → Discuss on-premise, national cloud, or hybrid deployment for your sovereignty requirements
Talk to institutions using Convay → Connect with universities and schools that have made the transition
Contact our education team to discuss how Convay can serve your specific teaching, research, and institutional coordination requirements.
